so what i’m hearing is …
Wait. Lemme get this straight. You’re saying that … what. The global temperature … is getting warmer? Am I completely off here?
No, that would be news to me.
Okay … uh-huh. You mentioned greehouse gases and … you know I don’t want to be blunt, but you did use the word “blame” somewhere in there. Is that what you meant? Uh-huh.
Well, maybe I’m mis-interpreting here, but it’s almost like you’re saying that there will be terrible destruction because of all of this. It’s like you’re obliquely implying that we’ll lose millions of lives and billions of dollars, by conservative estimates.
I mean, I don’t know: I don’t want to be putting words in your mouth, you know?
Yeah … Uh-huh. So … action is needed. Right.
Yeah … No, I’m sorry. I just don’t really understand what you’re trying to say. Maybe we should talk about this later.
February 2nd, 2007 at 6:16 pm
nice.
February 3rd, 2007 at 6:43 am
You might enjoy reading W’s new book, “A Convenient Lie.” It is of course very short and simple-minded, but lethal.
February 3rd, 2007 at 3:18 pm
You should turn that into an op-ed and submit to your local paper. I hear Exxon Mobil is paying $10,000 for anyone willing to throw mud at the IPCC report. Eeeeasssy munny.